So, naturally I turned to the internet for information about this drug.
Maybe this was a mistake. Reading the warnings on this drug make it sound like it has as much of a chance of killing you as helping you. It's meant to treat only very specific things, and if you don't have them - or have them too severe or not severe enough - you could die. Wow. I really hope this doctor knows what he's doing.
For example, here's a fun one:
Use of flecainide is no longer accepted for treatment of less severe arrhythmias such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardias or frequent premature ventricular contractions, even if patients are symptomatic, because of results of a trial that found increased mortality in patients with non–life-threatening arrhythmias treated with flecainideUmm.. okay - it says it is no longer accepted as a treatment for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) because it has the tendency of killing people who take it. So I know I have the ventricular tachycardia part, but what about the nonsustained part? I looked again to the Internets for help.
"...The term, defined as 3 or more consecutive beats arising below the atrioventricular node with a rate 120 beats/min and lasting less than 30 s,1–3 denotes an electrocardiographic finding that can be associated with an extremely wide range of clinical conditions, from patients with significant heart disease and annual mortality rates exceeding 50% to asymptomatic, apparently healthy, young individuals."
Okay, so apparently to be considered NSVT, the episode has to last under thirty seconds. The episode that they recorded on my holter monitor was 6 beats which lasted ~3 seconds.So the first quote says "this is not accepted for NSVT because it can kill you" and the second part tells me that I have NSVT. It then goes on to tell me the mortality rate exceeds 50% with people who have what I have. So by taking this medication, I am apparently making my chances even narrower. Holy shit.
What's even worse than that is a sentence a little further down:
In several trials, reduction of arrhythmias or even arrhythmic death was not associated with a concomitant reduction in total mortality.Great, so even if they wanted to do something about it, they couldn't.
All that considered, the saddest thing is that nobody I try to talk to about this seems to care. Doctors, I mean - they don't give me the time of day - they send me massive bills - and they don't explain to me what is going on or what courses of action I have open. They won't brainstorm with me or research what is going on . I always have a million questions when I go to a doctors appointment, but never have a chance to ask more than one or two of them.
Anyway, I think this about gets me caught up with everything that has happened. I left out several details, but this will give you the general idea. This is really the tip of the iceberg as far as what I've been going through with doctors and insurance companies, but I'll get into that more later. I've covered the most important and most serious issues here.
I will now start updating as things happen.